Kentucky administrator secures first humanist exemption from workplace AI

David Durman, a University of Kentucky administrator, secured a religious exemption from using artificial intelligence in his workplace. As a nontheistic humanist, Durman believes that using AI conflicts with his beliefs regarding moral action and critical thinking. He stated that AI interferes with people's ability to earn a living and threatens human creativity. Durman sought assistance from the American Humanist Association to investigate legal protections against mandatory AI use. He was inspired to pursue this path after reading about Erin Maus, a Unitarian Universalist software engineer who secured similar protections.

Alexandria Huiskens, a staff attorney at the American Humanist Association, stated that nontheists are protected by law at work regarding concerns about AI. The University of Kentucky determined that an accommodation could be provided to Durman while allowing him to continue performing the essential functions of his position. Jay Blanton, a university spokesperson, noted that the institution reviews requests for religious accommodations on an individual basis. Durman works in an administrative role supporting researchers applying for grants and has not been required to use AI at work.

Durman sought to secure his exemption now because colleagues and leadership have recommended that employees try out AI tools. He feared these recommendations might become a mandate. He hopes his case encourages others with similar concerns to pursue resolutions regarding AI use.